Matt Dickstein
Business Attorney
Making legal matters easy and economical for your business.

39300 Civic Center Drive, Suite 110, Fremont, CA 94538
510-796-9144. mattdickstein@hotmail.com. mattdickstein.com

Corporations & LLCs • Securities Law • Franchise Law
Business & Real Estate Law • Buying & Selling a Business (M&A)

HOME

中文

AREAS OF PRACTICE

Business Lawyer

Corporate / LLC Lawyer

Securities Lawyer

Franchise Lawyer

M&A Lawyer - Business Sales & Exit Planning

Lawyer for Real Estate Investors

LEGAL ARTICLES LIBRARY

ABOUT MATT

 

Structuring Real Estate Funds

A real estate investor’s projects increase in size and volume as the investor evolves.  With the growth, an investor might need more capital for down payments and development costs.  The investor might already have exhausted all available debt financing, however.  The investor might then decide to organize a real estate fund to accommodate passive investors who will bring in the extra needed capital.  The investor will be looking for equity financing now. 

In this presentation, I hope to give you a bird’s eye view of some of the bigger issues in structuring a real estate fund.  I will address two basic parts of organizing a fund: first, structuring the fund itself, and second, complying with securities laws when bringing in investors.    

Real estate funds are very complex.  This is not something to learn as you go.  Organizing a fund is a big step up in complexity.  You’ll need the help of accounting, tax and legal counsel who are experienced in the area.  In particular, securities law compliance is not a game for the uninitiated.

One last word to the wise: With a fund, you are responsible for other people’s money.  That’s a heavy burden.  The burden is heavier if your investors are friends and family, which usually is the case with new fund managers.  Many would-be fund managers give up after their first fund because of the added responsibility and stress.  In any case, without further ado, let me discuss structuring the fund and complying with securities laws when bringing in investors.

1. Structuring the Fund.  There are countless legal issues involved in structuring your fund.  All of the issues are potentially crucial.  That said, I will introduce three issues that are always important: the term of the fund (put otherwise, your deadline for returning your investors’ money); keeping control over your fund; and getting paid for managing the fund.

             1.1. Term of the Fund; Mandatory Return of Capital.  Here is the problem: your fund is not a mutual fund and you lack the liquidity to return an investor’s capital at will.  Nearly all of your investors’ capital will be tied up in investments.  This means you must liquidate investments to return an investor’s money – which may be impossible or disastrous.  From an investor’s perspective, however, they won’t trust you with their money for an indefinite term.

Solution: To solve this dilemma, you might write into your fund charter a deadline for the return of the investors’ money.  For example, you might provide that the fund will liquidate all investments and wind down by some date certain, e.g. two years after formation.  Now of course you must restrict your investments to deals from which you can exit within two years.  I usually write in provisions that let the managers extend the term for a few months to effect an orderly liquidation of assets.

             1.2. Control.  Your investors are passive, which means they should not have operational control.  Instead the fund’s managers control the fund.  The investors retain overall control only through their ability to replace the managers, and perhaps through certain specified veto rights. 

                    A veto right is a right held by the investors to block certain specified actions, for example, amendments to the charter documents; affiliate transactions; dissolution; etc.  The investors as a group exercise a veto right by the votes of a certain percentage of ownership (for example, 51% or 75% of the membership interests).

            1.3. Manager Compensation.  Manager compensation is where the negotiation gets difficult.  I have seen many variations on how managers are compensated, but as a general matter, managers usually receive a combination of management fees + “carry” + reimbursement of expenses.

                         1.3.1. Management Fees.  For small real estate funds, I frequently set management fees at some annualized percentage of the fair market value of assets.  The fund pays fees monthly or quarterly.  An annualized management fee of up to 3% of FMV is not unheard of. 

                         1.3.2. Carry.  A carry is essentially the managers’ share in fund profits.  A carry kicks in when the fund distributes money to investors.  A common formulation is for the fund to distribute all money to the investors until they have received 100% of their contributions plus a 10% preferred return.  After that, the investors and the managers divide all excess profits based on some agreed split, for example, investors 70 / managers 30.

                         1.3.3. Expenses.  Sophisticated investors are wary of how the fund pays expenses.  The issue is the allocation of fund expenses either: (i) to the fund (that is, to be paid by the investors out of their profits), or (ii) to the managers (that is, to be paid by the managers out of their fees).  This issue frequently stays hidden, but it is very important. 

2. Securities Laws.  When your fund offers or sells ownership interests to investors, the fund likely is conducting a securities offering.  A securities offering is a highly regulated and complex undertaking.  For every offering, the fund must comply with federal securities laws and the laws of each state where an investor resides.  This can add up to a lot of law.  Further, you do not have the choice to opt out of these laws – securities laws will apply to your fund whether you want them to or not.  Pretending the laws don’t exist won’t save you.

             2.1. Exemptions.  When complying with securities laws, small funds usually work within various exemptions, for example, state and federal private placement exemptions.  Most of the law applicable to your fund’s offering will be contained in the relevant private placement exemptions. 

            Exemptions are the key to any private offering of securities, but unfortunately they are far too complex and intricate for me to discuss at any length here.  I will only introduce some topics that in my practice I have found to be troublesome for organizers of real estate funds.

             2.2. Manner of the Offering.  You may not sell interests in your fund to just any person by any means.  When selling interests in your fund, you may not advertise or otherwise solicit the public.  This applies to the fund and anyone acting on its behalf (usually managers and brokers).  Hence you may not use any advertisement, article, notice or other communication in any newspaper, TV or similar media.  You may not use seminars whose attendees have been invited by any general solicitation or advertising.  In brief, you may only sell to investors with whom you have a pre-existing, substantive relationship.

             2.3. Brokers.  Not only must you sell interests in the fund in the manner described above, you also must be very careful about the people who help you sell the interests in your fund.  Extensive broker regulations apply to you and all other people who sell interests in your fund.  In brief, no one involved in the offering may be regularly engaged in selling securities unless that person is licensed as a securities broker.  Many professionals in the field forget about broker regulations (instead they concentrate exclusively on the exemptions).  This can be a fatal mistake if the investors bring litigation.

             2.4. Liability.  Securities violations usually come in two flavors: a technical defect in compliance with your applicable exemption, and/or securities fraud.  Securities fraud occurs when you misstate some material fact or fail to disclose some material fact.

            As a final matter, I will quickly summarize the consequences of violating your applicable securities laws.  In brief, purchasers of securities may bring an action against the fund and even you personally.  Generally, investors seek the return of the money they invested.  A technical defect in your exemption compliance can be the most frustrating for you, because an investor can leverage it into forcing you to return the investor’s money – you become an unwilling guarantor of the investment. 

            Lastly, if you remember nothing else, remember this: securities laws favor the investors, not you, and you can become personally liable for your fund’s violation of securities laws.

 This presentation only gives a brief outline of some issues involved in structuring a real estate fund.  I have only scratched the surface.  I strongly urge you to get competent legal, accounting and tax counsel when you set up a fund.  Competent counsel is a necessary part of the organization process.

Call me to schedule a legal consultation: 510-796-9144

   

Matt Dickstein, Business Attorney - 39300 Civic Center Drive, Suite 110, Fremont CA 94538
(510) 796-9144      mattdickstein@hotmail.com     www.MattDickstein.com

Business Lawyer      Corporate (LLC) Lawyer      Securities Lawyer     Franchise Lawyer

M&A Lawyer - Business Sales & Exit Planning      Real Estate Lawyer

Legal Articles Library      Contact San Francisco Bay Area Business Attorney      Site Map

Providing business legal services in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Silicon Valley, California, including San Jose,

Palo Alto, San Francisco, Oakland, Hayward, Fremont, Walnut Creek, Pleasanton and Sacramento