Matt Dickstein

Business Attorney

Making legal matters easy and economical for your business.

39488 Stevenson Place, Suite 100, Fremont, CA 94539
510-796-9144. mattdickstein@hotmail.com mattdickstein.com

Matt Dickstein

Business Attorney

Making legal matters easy and economical for your business.

39488 Stevenson Place, Suite 100, Fremont, CA 94539 510-796-9144. mattdickstein@hotmail.com mattdickstein.com

Accountants

Lawyer for Accountants, Accountancy Corporations and Group CPA Practices

How to Structure a New Group Accounting Practice

By Matt Dickstein

Click on a heading for more articles 

In this article I explain how to structure a new group accounting practice.  I focus on small practices that have only a few accountant / partners. I discuss four important issues for the structure of the business: share ownership, compensation, control rights, and lastly the partners’ exit from the practice.

Negotiate

You must negotiate the practice structure with your partners.  Discuss everything upfront – by this I mean put everything on the table and be petty. Don’t be embarrassed to talk money and negotiate for what you need. If you don’t resolve these issues now, you’re planting a timebomb in your practice.

Start negotiations with a term sheet that fully discusses each of the four items below. Once you’ve agreed at term-sheet level, you can draft final documents. A Shareholders (Buy-Sell) Agreement most likely will be the document that covers the issues in your term sheet.

Word to the Wise: Don’t commit yourself or your resources to the practice until the contracts are signed. There is no deal until the documents are done. Each commitment of resources weakens your position in the negotiations. This is especially true if you give up your current gig for the new venture, because you have nothing to go back to (hence no bargaining leverage).

Four Things to Negotiate

1. Contributions & Shares.  All contributions made by the partners should correlate directly into ownership. That is, ownership of the practice should correlate 1:1 with the partners’ contributions of cash, assumed liabilities, equipment, real estate, intellectual property etc.

*** For example, assume there are two accountants, and the first contributes $600,000 in assets while the second contributes $400,000.  Shareholder #1 should get 600 shares while shareholder #2 gets 400 shares, for a 60/40 split.

If a accountant will receive shares based on future labor to be performed, then the shares should be subject to vesting.  It’s common (and OK) for a shareholder to get his or her shares up-front based on the promise of future labor, but the shares must vest so that if the shareholder fails to perform the services, the accountant loses the unvested shares. To the extent possible, match the value of the services with the value of the shares, to maintain the 1:1 correlation between contributions and ownership.

2. Compensation.  A business is only worth the money it puts in the owners’ pockets, as all CPAs know.  I’ll let the experts (you) figure out the best compensation structure.

3. Control.  I prefer that share ownership percentages determine control within a corporation, because it’s simple and transparent. Many businesses use a one-man one-vote system, however, and that’s OK. Determine who has the number of shares needed to elect directors and how this power is distributed among the shareholders. This tells you who can control the board of directors. Then be careful to understand the nuances of your board of directors and the natural coalitions that exist among them.

Try this article; Corporate Structure – Levels of Legal Control over a Group Accounting Practice.

4. Exit.  All businesses need an exit plan. When disputes among the owners put the business in danger, they need a structure that ensures a fair resolution without having to go to court. I call this the economic divorce – if the business cannot survive a particular shareholder or partner, the buy-sell agreement gets you a divorce on terms that are fair to everyone. Usually you have buy-back provisions that cover the 4 D’s – a shareholder’s death, disqualification, disability and disputes. The result of buy-back is that one or more shareholders keep the business, and the exiting shareholder gets a payoff.

The buy-out price is crucial. A high buy-out price gives the exiting owner a windfall. A low buy-out price is unfair and leads to litigation. The trick is finding a procedure that ensures a fair price – most CPAs prefer a formula to fix the buy-out price.

For more on exits, read Shareholder Buy-Sell Agreements for Accounting Corporations, and also Buy-in and Buy-out of CPAs to an Accounting Group.

I wish you success.

Call me for a legal consultation – 510 796 9144